[GeoStL] Re: Should I Attach A Photo To My Caches?
- From: "Lyn Cook" <lynslyne@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 22:39:28 -0600
I don't think pictures are necessary. We haven't gone to any caches because
they had pictures posted. If there were pictures we didn't usually look at
them. Besides seeing the "real thing" is always better.
----- Original Message -----
From: Greg Ponder
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 9:26 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Should I Attach A Photo To My Caches?
Since I live in the boonies and have very few caches available to find, I've
been hiding caches. Someone suggested that I attach photos of the area where
I've hidden the cache. My whole purpose of hiding caches is to make people
aware of some great scenery, so the suggestion makes some sense. However, I'm
worried that it will ruin the surprise--that the "Wow! I'm glad I bushwhacked
across three states to see this place" will be reduced to "Well, I think the
picture's better."
What does everyone think? Would you go regardless of whether or not a picture
is attached? Or would a picture get you moving more quickly?
I appreciate the input and thank you in advance.
The Hairy Hillbilly
(Who May Soon Have More Caches Hidden Than Caches Found!)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
Other related posts:
