[GeoStL] Re: SLAGA Site Update

-
I definitely would not want to add more work to the already busy site
administrators.  So I vote for option #1.  If it is possible to only allow
'registered' users to post, and if the comments get marked with the name (or
geo-handle) of the person who posted, that ought to do it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of BottomFeeder
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 3:22 PM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: SLAGA Site Update
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Laura D [mailto:festive@xxxxxxxxxx]=20
> > Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2005 15:12
> > -
> > I hate that this even has to be considered, but what if=20
> > someone came along and wrote insults and/or obscenities? =20
> > Will the comments be screened before they appear on the website?
>
> A *very* valid concern.....and one a lot of sites (especially 'blogs') =
> fight these days.
>
> The tool we would use to provide this capability can be utilized in a =
> couple
> different ways to fight such problems.....
>
> 1) It can be configured such that only 'registered' users can post. So,
> there is some accountability there.
> 2) Any/all comments could be reviewed by site admins prior to being made
> public. If we were to implement #1, I would *hope* this one wouldn't be
> necessary.=20
>
>      -=3D Russ =3D- (BotFee)



 ****************************************
 Our WebPage!  Http://WWW.GeoStL.com  
 Mail List Info. http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
 Mail List FAQ's: http://www.freelists.org/help/questions.html 
 ****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
 send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
Subject field

Other related posts: