Glenn, I will take a look or at least a closer look at the site to see what it is all about however the key word in your email is in the subject line. Virtual CACHE and if I understand what waymarking is it is NOT caching and cannot be counted as a found cache. I don't have that much time that I can pick up another hobby even if it is close to what I have been doing in the past. So my original statement still stands there are no locationless CACHES and very few virtual CACHES left and not many more if any coming. Dan Glenn Nash <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: - Wake up Dan. There is whole new site (not so new as it has been around quite a while now) JUST for VIRTUAL caches and LOCATIONLESS caches exclusively. You do a disservice to everyone when you say that there are no virtual or locationless places highlighted anymore. http://www.waymarking.com/ Presently there are 82460 waymarks worldwide, listed in 656 user-created categories. WOW look at this neat old Victorian house. http://tinyurl.com/2q8fc4 The reason virtual and locationless caches were moved to the waymarking site is that Groundspeak realized a long time ago that there was a big interest in these neat locations and the old geocaching site and review system was not for dealing with these locations well. The waymarking site was designed to get these location listed and highlighted in some sort of organized fashion and remove them from the control of groundspeak personal. The categories are set up by the users and the waymarks are reviewed and listed by waymark users, not groundspeak personal or cache reviewers. There are waymarking categories that should satisfy about every ones interest. If there isn't, you can a new category. I have 2 categories that interest me, old Springhouses (if anyone knows of any, please submit it) and statues for real live living people. Stan the man has a few statues and many other are there. Worth a look if you really are interested in neat locations of all sorts. Yes, be careful what you wish for. Sometimes things will change and get better. Dan Henke wrote: snip... That is why we no longer have virtual or > locationless caches because someone decided that they weren't good for > OUR sport and got rid of them and now NONE of us get to decide if they > are worth doing or not. There were some fantastic caches in both > categories but now there are no new ones to judge. **************************************** For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.