[GeoStL] Re: NGR: Ask The Experts

  • From: "Mike Griffin" <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 09:31:09 -0600

I forwarded you 2 new Nikon camera papers.. One is an 8 megapixel.. IMO, if you 
are spending 500 for a camera, I would look at something that will still be a 
great camera 5 years from now. I like Nikon. I like digitals where you can 
change the lens on for a number of reasons.

Anyhow, I agree with Merkin. You have to decide what YOU want and live with 
that decision.

Mike

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Greg Ponder 
  To: slaga 
  Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 2:00 PM
  Subject: [GeoStL] NGR: Ask The Experts


  First things first: I'm ignorant (in case you were not already convinced).

  With that out of the way...I am seriously considering purchasing a fairly 
high quality digital camera, probably in the 4-5 megapixel range. My concern is 
storage. I don't want to purchase a camera that "can" take hi-res pictures but 
then dummy it down to lo-res because my butt's on a butte in Utah and my memory 
card, stick or disc (or cards, sticks or discs) are full.

  I don't have a laptop, but I'm considering one. It would be my storage device 
so that I can take the quality of picture that I desire while on my adventures.

  Is that a feasible (albeit expensive) approach or are there better ways to 
shoot high quality digital photos without running into storage problems out in 
the field.

  Thank ye for your input,

  Greg Ponder...The Hairy Hillbilly


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!

Other related posts: