[GeoStL] Re: Mass Caching Question

-

On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, BruceS wrote:

> If you are finding 3/3 or harder caches

<snip>

> (and what your often find is 1.5/1.5 caches that have been improperly
> rated anyway)

So it's not just me? :-)

I've noticed that almost nobody reads the actual rating guidelines...
You're right - most 3/3 caches are really 1-1.5s.  Of course, there's the
occasional "1.5" that is really a 4.5, so I guess it's hit and miss.  The
reason we started going for 3/3 or higher was that the 1/1, 2/2 etc were
just rediculously simple, and no challenge.  The 3 and ups at least
[generally] require a decent hike, although very few of them are really
difficult once you arrive.

When a cache is first reviewed, does the local admin doing the review
check for the rating, or is that left to the discretion of the placer?

-- 
Yours,

J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@xxxxxxx
0xBD4A95BF


"If I want to gamble, I'll continue to have unprotected
sex with my 14 year old first cousin."

   (T-Shirt Hell Advertisement)
 ****************************************
 Our WebPage!  Http://WWW.GeoStL.com  
 Mail List Info. http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
 Mail List FAQ's: http://www.freelists.org/help/questions.html 
 ****************************************
To unsubscribe from this list:
 send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the 
Subject field

Other related posts: