[GeoStL] Re: Log books

-
:-) sneaky....

gln

At 06:34 PM 2/28/2003 -0600, you wrote:
Just have a waterproof logbook attached and no signature is required. It satisfies their requirement..

Mike

"Insert useless tagline here"
----- Original Message -----
From: <mailto:jbensman1@xxxxxxxxxxx>Jim Bensman
To: <mailto:geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Log books

Micros would not be the only problem. I've used code words in several caches that regularly flood. While in those places I was able to rig up something that will maintain a code word through flooding, I could not do something with a log book that would withstand flooding.
-----Original Message-----
From: <mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jen Guyer
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:33 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Log books

I spent some time today in the forums. (My email program went on strike this morning, so couldn't even read what little mail was here.) I found the discussion on log books interesting. I am assuming this new mandatory log book thing is fairly new. For those who haven't heard this yet, traditional caches now have to have log books. You can't just put a code word in and have people email for verification. It should make for some interesting ideas for log books in micros.

Jen 

---------------------
Glenn
St. Louis, Mo



****************************************************************************
Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching ****************************************************************************




Other related posts: