[GeoStL] Re: Log books
- From: "Mike Griffin" <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 18:34:18 -0600
Just have a waterproof logbook attached and no signature is required. It
satisfies their requirement..
Mike
"Insert useless tagline here"
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Bensman
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:55 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Log books
Micros would not be the only problem. I've used code words in several caches
that regularly flood. While in those places I was able to rig up something
that will maintain a code word through flooding, I could not do something with
a log book that would withstand flooding.
-----Original Message-----
From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jen Guyer
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 4:33 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Log books
I spent some time today in the forums. (My email program went on strike
this morning, so couldn't even read what little mail was here.) I found the
discussion on log books interesting. I am assuming this new mandatory log book
thing is fairly new. For those who haven't heard this yet, traditional caches
now have to have log books. You can't just put a code word in and have people
email for verification. It should make for some interesting ideas for log books
in micros.
Jen
- Follow-Ups:
- [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- From: Glenn
- References:
- [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- From: Jim Bensman
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- » [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- From: Glenn
- [GeoStL] Re: Log books
- From: Jim Bensman