Bernie, That was a thought provoking message. I think you have a good point. I think at the very least, caching needs to be sensitive to the points you made, but I think there can be ways to do them that are not disrespectful. I?ve been in some neat cemeteries looking for caches. (And don?t forget that time you turned into a ghost :-)) I would also point out how our society tends to disrespect native American burial and sacred sites. So I would include them in the same category. I also agree with your point on how caching can damage sensitive sites. I think sometimes cachers (this is NOT directed at you Dan) only think about where they place their cache instead of where cachers will likely look. In sensitive areas (if a cache is appropriate), there should be clear directions or hints to make it real easy to find to minimize the risk of damage. Dan, I noticed the log talked about a no trespassing sign. When I have seen no trespassing signs, I respect them and do not go for the cache. I think a cache page needs to specifically address such a sign if permission is granted. IMHO, whenever a cache is on private property, I think the cache page should indicate this and that permission has been granted. I hear you about the cost of driving ? but the real problem is not the price of gas. The problem is our government will not force the car manufactures to make our vehicles more efficient (?CAFÉ Standards?). If your truck was twice as efficient, you would need half as much gas. The main reason why the prices are going up is the demand for gas. If cars were more efficient, there would be less demand (and less pollution) which would result in lower gas prices. We have the technology to make vehicles get vastly greater mileage and we have lots of smart people that can invent more ways. While Illinois Senators vote for higher CAFÉ standards, your Senators keep voting against them. If I were you, I would write them about this. We are not going to drill our way out of the mess, we need to use American ingenuity to invent our way out. Jim Bensman "Nature Bats Last" _____ From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bernie Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:52 PM To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [GeoStL] Re: HTM#1 Witches Cemetery I'm happy to hear that you are thinking of archiving this cache. I don't believe I have done it. The search engine in GC.com sucks so bad that I could not find it. Dan, my thoughts have nothing to do with you or your cache. These are just personal feelings. I have always felt that caches in cemeterys should not be allowed and yes I have done a few of them in my travels. I think it is disrespectful to the dead and their loved ones trump sing around looking for a cache. There are so many other places where we can play our game. I have expressed my feelings about this in several of my logs. As far as old historic rock walls or foundations. Well, if each cacher only wiggles loose one rock or stone or worse yet, removes only one or two rocks, what will the wall look like down the road. I have seen quite a bit of damage to some walls. They can not be replaced and are lost forever. Don't be mad, just a couple of my personal thoughts. Bernie. Dan Henke wrote: To all SLAGA members: Here is a note I posted on the above mentioned cache: ************************* In answer to the previous DNF note I thought I would defend myself against the slightly veiled accusations. 1st: This is an OLD cemetery that is not maintained very well or at all by the locals. The rundown appearance is part of the mystique of the place. It was NOT caused by geocachers. 2nd: The wall was in the shape it is in now when I placed the cache and has not changed much in the time the cache has been in place. IT was NOT torn down by geocachers looking for the cache. I am sure some rocks were moved but in the case of the wall it did nothing to destroy it. 3rd: Yes I did get permission to place the cache there and as to the damage caused by cachers please see the first two points. 4th: I am tired of being dumped on about this cache...it is in a very cool and historic location....you see some very interesting and exotic country....there is an old fashioned country store there that is almost worth the trip in itself which is why I set the cache in the first place. The cache itself is almost secondary to the things you see on the way and while you are in the neighborhood. The cache is difficult yes but is not anymore difficult than some others I have done...you DO NOT have to destroy anything to find it....it is located under a couple of rocks in the wall but in almost every case I have checked on it there was a portion of the cache visible if you look close enough..... 5th: I am seriously thinking of archiving this cache as it has proved too difficult for a lot of people and it is too far away for me to maintain it easily So if you have had this one on your to do list ...you might want to do it quick Thunder *************************** As stated in the log I am thinking VERY seriously about archiving this cache....it is difficult to maintain and with the price of gas going as high as it is I do NOT want to have to drive 45 to 50 minutes out of my way to check on a cache I am sure is there but just not found. So for those of you who have not found it yet you might want to consider going for it soon. Dan (Thunder) _____ Start your <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=34442/*http:/www.yahoo.com/r/hs> day with Yahoo! - make it your home page **************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html **************************************** To unsubscribe from this list: send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field