[St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 18:30:30 -0500
I believe this is the conventional standard. It's good to know that somebody
has them... as for company stuff.
Anybody want to buy some SLAGA hats??
Glenn
>
> .com is a domain name for a variety of websites, including associations,
> organizations - not just companies.
That's not the definition of '.com'. '.com' is for companies.
Organizations
are '.org'. In term of domain names, it would be been more appropriate
for us to be '.net'. But that's beside the point. '.com' is part of a
domain
name. We are a geocaching group, not an internet web site.
*****************************************************************************
Our NEW WebPage! WWW.GeoStL.com
Mail List & Archive Info.
http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=geocaching
Msg. of the day, "These days, I spend a lot of time thinking about the
hereafter...
I go somewhere to get something and then wonder what I'm here after.
******************************************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: Paul Konopacki
Other related posts:
- » [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- » [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- » [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- » [St. Louis Area Geocachers] Re: [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- [GeoSTL] Re: SLAGA vs. GeoStl.com
- From: Paul Konopacki