[GeoStL] Re: Foo Foo The Snoo....

-
I used the GC.com "E-mail this user" feature, as I recall.
You know, I could easily describe a cache based upon logs that I have read.
I say, you don't sign the log, you don't get the find..

I made sure to ask questions that could not be determined from the logs,
such as the colors of the container. Mine would have been rather difficult
to guess.

-Eta526

On 6/28/06, Brad Myers <bmyers88@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -
> What e-mail address did you use? I e-mailed the address that was listed on
> Geocaching.com and it bounced back, so his logs were deleted since he
> hadn't
> signed them.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Mertz
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:12 AM
> To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Foo Foo The Snoo....
>
> -
> I had asked him to describe my cache, and he did a sufficient job for me
> to
> believe that he had been there. TMC was similarly satisfied after
> E-mailing
> the suspect after I had mentioned the lack of logs.
> -Eta 526
>
> On 6/27/06, dana cook <zoejuju@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > -
> > I thought something was not quite right with this person logging La
> Roche
> > de
> > la Croix when the river was too high to get to the rock. I emailed to
> ask
> > him how he got to the rock but he never replied. Geez, some folks have
> too
> > little to do! (I wish I was one of them!! :-))
> >
> > Dana
> >
> > ----Original Message Follows----
> > From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reply-To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Foo Foo The Snoo....
> > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:44:36 -0500
> >
> > -
> > As are the cache owners in Florida, some cache owners in Missouri and
> > elsewhere. One of my personal rules are Find it and sign the log. I
> > don't have many rules but signing the log seems to be  part of the deal.
> >
> > Delete away and don't even look back.
> >
> > Eric East wrote:
> > > -
> > > He or she is a phoney. They are logging caches without going there. I
> > was
> > tipped off via an e-mail & sure enough when I checked the log books,
> they
> > had never signed them.
> > > I'm deleting their logs!
> > > Eric
> > >
> > >
> > >  ****************************************
> > >  For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from
> > this
> > >  list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> > >  Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >   ****************************************
> >   For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from
> > this
> >   list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> >   Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ****************************************
> > For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from
> this
> > list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> > Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
> >
>
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
>


 

 ****************************************
 For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
 list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching 
 Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived  http://tinyurl.com/87cqw

Other related posts: