[GeoStL] Re: Extreme Geocaching

  • From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:15:11 -0500

-
That is generally the case. To trespassing signs are generally the kiss of death but sometimes they are old signs. RGS and I had permission to place caches on the old Packwood estate. The No Trespassing signs were old ones and we had permission to ignore them. In this case, the land now belongs to the DNR and the old signs are no longer valid and the geocachers have permission to be there. If you were to place a cache out in the woods someplace that looked like the back end of a county park and we came across a row of NO TRESSPASSING signs that no one knew about, you as the cache owner didn't know about but we still had to pass to get to your cache, I would say that the cache would be put on hold or archived until the sign issue could be sorted out. 


Glenn


RNX wrote:

-
what about the "ignore the no trespassing signs". I thought that was the kiss
of death in a cache submission. I know the cache owner states that the no
trespassing signs are not legit but i seem to remember reading somewhere that
Groundspeak does not/will not be part of that debate and issued a blanket
prohibition on any cache with such a note. But then again, Glenn lives,
breathes, and drips geocaching so he would know better than I.

------ Original Message ------
Received: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:21:00 PM EDT
From: Glenn <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Extreme Geocaching

-
I didn't see a problem with it.
It looks involved, long, tough and possibly dangerous but there are plenty of safety warnings. No one will take on this cache for an easy afternoon outing. It is for the hardy soles out there. 
glenn




Jack Konecker wrote:

http://tinyurl.com/fjwm4
This is a link to a 'Subscriber Only' 
cache.  You will need to be a premium
Geocaching.com member in order to
see the cache page.
Hope to never see one of 
these in St. Louis.  Not sure
why someone would go through
the trouble or how groundspeak
would let one of these get
approved.
*Psycho Urban Cache #9 - Hot Glowing Tribulations A cache by Vinny & Sue Team 
<http://www.geocaching.com/profile/?guid=4c01eb97-9ee4-4b48-9674-54cdec26c777&wid=deb1fe4c-1f5f-4529-a986-c332841529da&ds=2>*
*Hidden:* 2/4/2006 *Size: * (Regular) 
*Difficulty:* *******      *Terrain:* *******
This is a subscriber-only cache.
DANGER! You MUST read 
warnings/disclaimer and advisories
below! Do NOT attempt this cache
if you are not in excellent physical
shape, if you're afraid of getting wet,
dirty, darkness, or afraid of heights,
radiation, toxic chemical waste, asbestos,
confined spaces, spiders, snakes, rats,
mud, odors, pain or blood. Sophisticated
safety gear will be needed.





****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. geocaching
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2007