[GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
-
I will say other people in other parts of the country
would disagree.
I'll leave it at that.
-Michael
--- Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -
> Thanks Glenn... It amazes me that people are so
> quick to judge without ever
> meeting the guy..
>
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Glenn Nash" <GLNash@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 5:06 PM
> Subject: [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
>
>
> > -
> > He is actually a he$$ of a nice guy, maintains his
> caches all over the
> > country better than most folks maintain their
> caches in town. He was one
> > of the 1st folks to actually hide many caches
> downtown. Leave it to an out
> > of towner to think anything like that would be
> important for anyone.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Lusicic wrote:
> >> - I just read his profile, and I came away with
> the following:
> >>
> >> 1. He has hidden quite a few caches, and with
> their diverse
> >> locations may not be able to keep up with
> that many and that
> >> MIGHT be a factor.
> >> 2. I have not hidden any so I really cannot
> know much about 1
> >> above, so I think I should shy away from
> that.
> >> 3. I see someone who is avid about what he
> does and doesn't
> >> understand those who are not up to his
> level of commitment.
> >> 4. He has his own ideas and feelings and is
> sharing them openly and
> >> not trying to be politically correct. They
> just seem to be a
> >> genuine expression of what he feels without
> a PC filter applied.
> >> I rather like that and would rather know
> what someone REALLY
> >> thinks even if I don't agree with them.
> >> 5. I like his approach to creating caches. I
> have not attempted to
> >> find any of his, so I don't know whether
> what he says translates
> >> into reality, but if it does, then I can
> see his disappointment
> >> in his hard work being violated.
> >> 6. If he is hiding things just for the
> pleasure he gets out of the
> >> logs and adulation for a good cache, then I
> think he could have
> >> a better, healthier attitude. Perhaps he
> should not be in it for
> >> praise or think it is only good if it works
> the way he envisions
> >> it. 'Tis better to give than receive. That
> is just my own not
> >> politically corrected opinion.
> >> 7. It is frustrating finding a cache that has
> been trashed, so I
> >> can imagine his frustration in having to
> replace them.
> >> 8. I too don't feel like people should be
> making a big deal about
> >> leaving, but this is a notice on his cache,
> which I can
> >> certainly understand. He published his
> philosophy of not
> >> archiving caches, so if he is going to
> change his policy, then I
> >> see it as only a courtesy to announce that
> as well. He certainly
> >> does not appear to have a problem with
> saying what is on his
> >> mind. Again, I admire that.
> >> 9. I don't agree that he should be name
> calling, but if he has to
> >> put a label on the group causing problems,
> then is it all that
> >> bad? He may have chosen perhaps a better
> label which goes back
> >> to political correctness, but if it is a
> reflection of what is
> >> in his mind, and it is his cache page, then
> why not. I don't
> >> believe in censorship.
> >>
> >> That being said, I respect the opinions expressed
> by others who don't
> >> think very much of this guy. If I did otherwise I
> would be a hypocrite
> >> since I don't believe in censorship. So in the
> end, he has opinions and
> >> y'all do to. And here are mine. A different
> perspective often helps me
> >> when I think about things. So that is why I
> express mine. Sometimes I get
> >> something back that makes me think, and that is
> always a growth
> >> experience. That is why I don't mind off topic
> discussions because I
> >> think they are an opportunity to grow and learn.
> >>
> >> Michael Rogers wrote:
> >>> -
> >>> He could place a hundred of the best downtown
> and it
> >>> still wouldn't excuse his behavior.
> >>>
> >>> -Michael
> >>>
> >>> --- Andrew Senger <asenger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -
> >>>> Nice reply, Mike.
> >>>>
> >>>> If we took CC's caches away from downtown,
> there'd
> >>>> be hardly any left.
> >>>> His hides are some of the best I've seen,
> >>>> especially for urban areas.
> >>>> It took three trips to St Louis Riverfront to
> >>>> complete that one, and
> >>>> I still haven't found Old Saint Lou after three
> >>>> trips (granted, one at
> >>>> night). There's another less than a block from
> >>>> where I park for work
> >>>> that I haven't tried yet. I can only imagine
> that
> >>>> it's just as
> >>>> tricky.
> >>>>
> >>>> Not only does CC place caches, he's one of the
> few
> >>>> that will replace
> >>>> caches, whether it's replacing a broken
> container or
> >>>> a full log.
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrew (yawetag)
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/26/07, Mike Griffin <griff@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> -
> >>>>> I agree with Coolcache. I think that if you
> take
> >>>>>
> >>>> the time for a good hide
> >>>>
> >>>>> with unique containers, you deserve more than
> a
> >>>>>
> >>>> cut and paste log. I have
> >>>>
> >>>>> seen people delete cut and paste logs
> (Dallas). If
> >>>>>
> >>>> you spend time creating a
> >>>>
> >>>>> clever cache, the least a person can do is
> hide it
> >>>>>
> >>>> back as they found it.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Too many times people just stuff it back
> because
> >>>>>
> >>>> there is another cache only
> >>>>
> >>>>> .15 from where they are. It gets frustrating!!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> He should be proud of the hides and his
> >>>>>
> >>>> containers. He has hidden 82.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Without people like him, what would we look
> for? I
> >>>>>
> >>>> know his pain.. I too
> >>>>
> >>>>> have become frustrated with carelessness.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mike
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Andrew Senger
> >>>> asenger@xxxxxxxxx
>
=== message truncated ===
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
- References:
- [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- From: Mike Griffin
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- » [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- [GeoStL] Re: CoolCaches to be Archived
- From: Mike Griffin