[GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- From: "GC-RGS" <gc-rgs@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:56:53 -0500
-
Mike,
I don't have any of those units, but here's my opinion.
I have the legend B&W and a LegendCx, both having "non electronic" compass.
I have no problem with it and don't have to calibrate often like some of the
owners seem to need to do. I know whenever the batteries are changed, it
MUST be recalibrated. But, it can be tuned off too and then works like the
non "s" units. If I were going to buy one, it would be the 60Cx, unless
there were just a few dollars difference.
As far as the 76, it has the same sirf chip but a slightly larger screen and
case, and the button layout is a little different. The antenna does not
stick out of the top of the case either. It also seems to have a more
metallic case than the rubberized 60 series. I know LeRoy has one and really
likes it.
Rich
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Tollefson" <mbtoll@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 9:43 AM
Subject: [GeoStL] CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
> -
> It seems that the Garmin Map CSx60 is the most popular GPSr (if you have
> the $$$), especially due to its superior antenna. I have also heard some
> folks not too enthusiastic with the electronic compass. So my question is
> how many of you actually use the "S" features - the electronic compass and
> barometric altimeter? Isn't the Cx60 essentially the same without those
> two features? It is a little less expensive. Also I never hear anything
> about the CSx76. Any idea on how it is different from the CSx60? Thanks!
>
> Mike
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ****************************************
> For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
> list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
> Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
****************************************
For List Info or To make _ANY_ changes, including unsubscribing from this
list, click -----> http://www.freelists.org/list/geocaching
Missouri Caches Scheduled to be Archived http://tinyurl.com/87cqw
- Follow-Ups:
- [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- From: fourfeld
- References:
- [GeoStL] CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- From: Mike Tollefson
Other related posts:
- » [GeoStL] CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- » [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- [GeoStL] Re: CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- From: fourfeld
- [GeoStL] CSx60 vs Cx60 vs CSx76
- From: Mike Tollefson