| -
I tend to agree with pretty much all of this. Also, there should
probably be a description of where the boundary is for trespassing
since there is a sign but no other way of knowing. I have see this on
other cache descriptions, and I don't think that should be optional. If
you could reasonably wind up on private property, I think there should
be something like that to keep people off where they don't really want
to be in the first place. There should be fair warning about the neighbor for those who feel they do not want to get involved with him. To me it is just another "obstacle" in getting there. If the cemetery doesn't belong to him, then he has no right to keep people out regardless of what someone else did on his property. If he has a problem with people on his property, then that is where he should be when he does his "discourage the trespassers" routine. Lets say his property is next to Wal Mart and he has the same problem. Does that give him the right to terrorize people who park in Wal Mart and carry on otherwise legal activity there? I am not an advocate of going in there with a chip on my shoulder, but I am a firm believer that we have to exercise our freedom, or we will certainly lose it. The Deen Family wrote: I found this cache last summer. The area in which it is located is indeed rural, but really not far off the beaten track as the cemetery fronts the local highway. The cemetery / private property line is not clearly indicated by any fence or signage that I recall, and without knowing definitively where the property line lies, I would say that this cache might be located on or near the property line.**************************************** Our WebPage! Http://WWW.GeoStL.com Mail List Info. //www.freelists.org/list/geocaching Mail List FAQ's: //www.freelists.org/help/questions.html **************************************** To unsubscribe from this list: send an email to geocaching-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field |
