[fruityloops] Re: Nominal Sound Forge Rendering . . .(continued)
- From: Andrew Ebling <andyebling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 09:27:45 +0100
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 09:21, Gwydion Elderwyn wrote:
> I use LAME on the highest (and
> slowest) quality setting and even at 128k I have a hard time telling it from
> my original WAV file.
Can I send you a pack of cotton buds to clean your ears out with? ;-p
Andy
--
The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may
be legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not
a named addressee, please inform us as soon as possible on
+44 118 901 2999 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are
not a named addressee you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute,
print or rely on this e-mail. Any views expressed in this e-mail or any
attachments may not necessarily reflect those of Tao's management.
Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should scan this
e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Tao makes no representation or
warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments.
Please note that for the protection of our business, we may monitor and
read e-mails sent to and from our server(s).
Visit our website at http://tao-group.com/
Other related posts:
