[fruityloops] Re: Are 16 FX channels enough?
- From: "Raymond Cherry" <filthykarma@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 19:27:25 -0400
Good question! I have a standard setup I use for FLoops wherein I have 6
tracks open. For the Master FX, I have the dB meter and big clock open, and
for my 6 tracks, I have each one loaded with Parametric EQ first and
Compression second.
At this point, I have yet to add any more than 2 additional FX as I really
don't need any more than 4. I am kind of the feeling that if I can't get
the sound I am listening for within 4 effects, there's a good chance I am
going about the sounds' manufacture in the wrong fashion.
I guess if one makes dance or electronica all the time, FX are something to
be heaped on lavishly, but sometimes I like a bass to sound like a bass, and
drums to sound like drums, not like crazed, digital blips.
In light of all this, I may wish one day that I had bought into Gigasampler,
because it is supposed to be the best at reproducing real instruments . . .
Layyyter . . .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Ebling" <andyebling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <fruityloops@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 8:01 AM
Subject: [fruityloops] Are 16 FX channels enough?
>
> Inspired by a discussion in looptalk, here is something for discussion
> on this list:
>
> With fruity you have 16 FX channels plus 4 sends at your disposal.
>
> Is that enough?
> Do you find 16 channels limiting?
> Could you use more?
> Would more FX channels necessarily be a good thing?
>
> Would a different approach to FX processing be better? (Perhaps
> something like the environment window in Logic, but for audio rather
> than MIDI).
>
> What are your thoughts on this?
>
> Andy
> --
>
> The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may
> be legally privileged. If you have received this e-mail and you are not
> a named addressee, please inform us as soon as possible on
> +44 118 901 2999 and then delete the e-mail from your system. If you are
> not a named addressee you must not copy, use, disclose, distribute,
> print or rely on this e-mail. Any views expressed in this e-mail or any
> attachments may not necessarily reflect those of Tao's management.
> Although we routinely screen for viruses, addressees should scan this
> e-mail and any attachments for viruses. Tao makes no representation or
> warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments.
> Please note that for the protection of our business, we may monitor and
> read e-mails sent to and from our server(s).
>
> Visit our website at http://tao-group.com/
>
>
Other related posts:
