Tom's original email. You are totally right about the 1.0 template. Also, avoid the 1.0 extensions. On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Fr. Robert Bower <frrobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Rick, > > > I am not sure if your question is response to tom's original email or my > comment. > > If it is response to my comment , here is why I said to remove the 1.0 > template from consideration. > > A 1.0 template is compatible with Joomla 1.0 > > A 1.5 template is compatible with Joomla 1.5 > > The current version of Joomla is 1.5 while version 1.0 of Joomla has > reached end of life. > > The template format for Joomla 1.5 is very different then the format for > 1.0. > > To use a 1.0 tempate with Joomla 1.5 you must either convert the template > to 1.5 which is like writing a template from scratch or trying to use the > legacy feature in Joomla 1.5 which also has issues. > > So it is best to use a 1.5 template with a Joomla 1.5 site. > > > Thanks, > > Fr. Robert Bower > Batushka's Web Hosting & Designfrrobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > 574.850.7982http://www.batushkas.comhttp://www.batushkas.net > > > > Rick Tribble wrote: > > I take it you looked through the hundreds of free 1.5 templates and these > are that much better or more stable somehow? > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Fr. Robert Bower <frrobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > >> I would remove Element from consideration, it is a 1.0 template not a 1.5 >> template. >> >> Running a 1.0 template on a 1.5 site is possible but in no way easy. >> >> My suggestion would be only consider 1.5 templates >> >> Thanks, >> >> Fr. Robert Bower >> Batushka's Web Hosting & Design >> frrobert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> 574.850.7982 >> http://www.batushkas.com >> http://www.batushkas.net >> >> >> >> Tom Brown wrote: >> >>> There are a gazillion templates available for Joomla web sites, and some >>> of them are way cool. The dev group decided to narrow its focus to three >>> professionally designed templates from Joomla Shack which we think are >>> suitable for our web site and which use FOSS technologies. The three >>> templates are EarthBlog, Relevant and Element. >>> >>> >>> https://www.joomlashack.com/pro-joomla-templates/286-js-earthblog-template >>> https://www.joomlashack.com/pro-joomla-templates/272-js-relevant-template >>> https://www.joomlashack.com/pro-joomla-templates/32-js-element-template >>> >>> If you are interested in voting, please visit the Joomla Shack site and >>> look at the live demo for each template and the specs. Then rank your >>> preference from 1 to 3; one being your favorite. A preferential vote is >>> called an Instant Runoff Vote (IRV). The template with the most votes wins. >>> If there is a tie, possible although unusual in IRV, I will pick the winner >>> from the tied templates. >>> >>> Joomla Shack template licenses cost $40 per web site. >>> >>> The Element template is not Joomla 1.5 native so Chuq sent an email to >>> Joomla Shack asking whether Element works with 1.5, what it lacks in 1.5 and >>> whether a native 1.5 template is in the works. >>> >>> Tom >>> ** This list is PUBLICLY archived. ** >>> PLEASE don't post personal or sensitive information unless you wish for >>> it to be in the public domain. >>> >>> To post to the list send email to frgeek-michiana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> The archive is available at >>> //www.freelists.org/archives/frgeek-michiana/ >>> >>> You may unsubscribe or change your list settings by going to the list >>> website at //www.freelists.org/webpage/frgeek-michiana >>> >>> >>> >>> ** This list is PUBLICLY archived. ** >> PLEASE don't post personal or sensitive information unless you wish for it >> to be in the public domain. >> >> To post to the list send email to frgeek-michiana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> The archive is available at >> //www.freelists.org/archives/frgeek-michiana/ >> >> You may unsubscribe or change your list settings by going to the list >> website at //www.freelists.org/webpage/frgeek-michiana >> >> >