In vintage my collection probably has more Conklin Crescent than any other pen, a fair number, most working and impressive, most unused and boxed because I spent more on a few of them than most other pens in my collection, and then it gets iffy. If I like a pen, there will be many in different colors and clip, band, etc., styles. That brings to mind that I really like Pelikans, so they appear in many forms, ages and price ranges. I like Sailors and Platinums. For sheer number, I may have more Sheaffer, because they are of my time, I was taught to write with a dip pen and an inkwell in the hole in the desk. I don't specifically remember Esterbrooks from my youth, but I have a large collection now. I have NONE of the colors that I really really want (the Foliage Green brings out absolute lust, saw it once, it wasn't up for grabs, maybe one day). I continue to accumulate but perhaps not as fast as I have in the past. There is no real focus to my collection. I have only one or two Waterman, not many Parker, that's fine with me, they are enough. As I keep looking, I find that I have become more interested in where the pens originate. I love my Italian pens for looks, the Platinum line also is eye candy, some pens don't have to be held to please, they provide return on two levels, just seeing/owning and then the ultimate writing/owning. Elaine > I collect Waterman mainly: > Waterman: 85% > Sheaffer: 8% > Parker: 5% > Misc: 2% > This does not count pens I intend to sell. > TTFN, > Grem > --- Max Davis <maxpen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Survey >> >> What number of member collects Parker over Waterman? >> ========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to fptalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. The email that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions to complete the process.