Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- From: ChgoSatrap@xxxxxxx
- To: fptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:41:14 EDT
In a message dated 10/13/2006 8:03:48 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
richard.jarvis@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
So, while I rarely quibble over issues such as this (although my doing so is
far from unique), the use of the word unique is where I'm a hardliner.
Richard
And if everybody is unique, nobody is.
satrap
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Unique is, well, unique ...
- From: Ray Blake
Other related posts:
- » Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » RE: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » RE: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » RE: Unique is, well, unique ...
- » Re: Unique is, well, unique ...
- RE: Unique is, well, unique ...
- From: Ray Blake