Re: [foxboro] two quick questions
- From: "Corey R Clingo" <clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:53:51 -0500
We've done it here without any problems that I know of, at least since
version 6.1.
Corey
|---------+----------------------------->
| | tom.vandewater@dow|
| | corning.com |
| | Sent by: |
| | foxboro-bounce@fre|
| | elists.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 02/12/2004 01:23 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to |
| | foxboro |
| | |
|---------+----------------------------->
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: foxboro
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [foxboro] two quick questions
|
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Are there a lot of people using the method described below?
:TC100_PIDA.HOLIM.100
I like it but I can remeber having intermittent problems with connecting
paramters in a block to other parameters within that same block. The most
famous was a block initialization problem when linking the .FBK parameter
to
the same blocks .OUT parameter. An unresolved linkage could occur causing
the controller output to drift toward zero. Those issue may have been
fixed
but we have long since avoided internal linkages.
It would be nice to know if this link is dependable.
Thanks for any feedback.
Tom VandeWater
Control Systems Developer/Analyst
Dow Corning Corp.
Carrollton, KY USA
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: