Re: [foxboro] set_confirm for boolean
- From: Martin Theobald <m.theobald@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 21:25:50 +0100
Is it an example of good programming that will go on to survive or a
'fix' that could be caught out in the future...
Heath, Graham wrote:
>
<Snipped>
>
> PS with the code I threw together setting x2 to anything other than zero
> will set the value TRUE
>
> so without worrying too much how or why the example prsesented worked.
> Which in the end is whats required!! :<).
>
<snipped>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
