Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: "Jeremy Milum" <jmilum@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:24:41 -0600
On 1/24/07, David Johnson <drjohn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I thought that rmount throttled back the amount of traffic put on the
> nodebus, whereas rcp doesn't.
ahhh, good point. I assumed a 2nd ethernet connection, but as you
point out, that is not the case.
I believe that rmount has a maximum limit on the length of the file path?
How is throttling done for transferring files on a windows I/A system
over the nodebus?
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- References:
- [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: David Johnson
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: David Johnson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- » Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
- [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: David Johnson
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: Jeremy Milum
- Re: [foxboro] rmount fails
- From: David Johnson