Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: Duc M Do <duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 23:49:34 -0400
Yeah, I said I wasn't following this thread very closely and it showed.
I re-read Brian's original posting and he said exactly what I was
trying to say. Duh!
Sorry about that.
Duc
At 04:20 PM 4/29/04 -0400, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) wrote:
>Duc,
>
>What you write works if and only if, the DM is not tied to a PC by the dmcfg
>file.
>
>I believe Brian wants to specify the PC and the head on the PC in the dmcfg
>file. The software that processes the dmcfg file does not allow it.
>
>It seems to me that we could do something by changing hi_init, but at the
>end of the day it didn't do what we wanted.
>
>Regards,
>
>Alex Johnson
>Invensys Systems, Inc.
>10707 Haddington
>Houston, TX 77043
>713.722.2859 (voice)
>713.722.2700 (operator)
>713.932.0222 (fax)
>ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx
>For the latest information on ArchestrA, go to
>http://www.invensys.com/Archestra.html.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of duc.do@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 2:30 PM
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
>
>>It looks like the dm_wp50 program appends :0 to the ip address of dedicated
>>machines.
>>I guess Foxboro never anticipated remote machines with multiple heads.
>
>Brian,
>
>I haven't followed this thread closely since we're not setting dedicated DM
>in the dmcfg file and I figured I wouldn't have anything to offer. But your
>assertion above made me sit up and take notice.
>
>Like I said, we don't dedicate DM to certain remote station, but on the
>remote side (albeit dual-headed Windows boxes in our case) we can call up a
>DM and designate it to go to the primary or secondary display. Adding :1 to
>the PC's nodename in the DM script call sends the DM to the secondary
>display. Omitting :1 (or explicitly specifying :0) sends it to the primary
>display. So, it's the long-winded way to say that it's possible to designate
>a DM to go to certain head on a multi-head workstation, at least from the
>calling end of it.
>
>(Our script to invoke the remote DM is a modified version of
>/opt/ia/.profile mainly to smooth the communication between PCs on our LAN
>and the 2nd Ethernet port of the 51-series boxes.)
>
>Hope this help a little.
>
>Duc
>
>--
>Duc M. Do
>Dow Corning Corp.
>Carrollton Plant
>Carrollton, KY, US
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)