Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: "Ronald Stear" <rstear@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:22:04 -0500
Brian, if you're going to set up as server to serve DM's or FV's you might
want to look into Hummingbirds 'Exceed On Demand', a server based app that
also handles licenses well. It's a web based interface so if you set up
security and permissives you can even serve a DM to yourself over the
internet. I haven't seen much of it myself since it was installed just
after I retired but a short demo from a PC during a visit showed me that it
was fast... faster than Go Global.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Bates" <batesb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 9:24 AM
Subject: Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
>
>
>
>
>
> Gops
>
> We have many AW's and WP's at this site configured to serve remote DM's to
> many PC's running exceed.
> Most DM's are dedicated to groups of PC's, some are undedicated.
> That is not the issue.
>
> This is something new. I don't know if this has been done before, or even
> if it is possible.
>
> I am trying to configure windows "Terminal Services" that can use exceed
to
> serve up virtual desktops running exceed and IA DM's to remote PC's.
> Check here for more info:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/technologies/terminal/default.asp
> This one server can connect to many AW's, or WP's simultaneously, and
serve
> them to many PC's.
>
> With this configuration, you don't need exceed on the PC. You only need
> Microsoft terminal server client, or with Microsoft XP, it is part of the
> OS.
>
> I can get remote DM's to work on the virtual heads :1, :2, :3 etc, if they
> are undedicated in dmcfg.
> The problem is when DM's are dedicated in dmcfg, they will only work on
the
> first head ":0".
>
> I need dedicated DM's to work on all heads.
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> gop@xxxxxxxx
> Sent by: To:
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> foxboro-bounce@fr cc:
> eelists.org Subject: Re: [foxboro]
remote DM's on multi-headed
> machine
>
> 04/29/2004 09:32
> AM
> Please respond to
> foxboro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Brian,
>
>
>
> I have set up Exceed sessions with specific targets assigned to the DM's.
>
> We did not bother about the screen variables though.
>
>
>
> I do not have the WP in front of me , but If I remember right , the dmcfg
>
> File looked something like this :
>
>
>
> For a Dual Head WP0001 with 4 DM licenses, opening DM Named WP0001 on
>
> bottom screen,DM Named WP0002 on top screen, DM Named WP0003 on Remote
PC1,
>
>
> &DM Named WP0004 on Remote PC2
>
>
>
> REMPC1 &REMPC2 are alias names defined in my /etc/hosts file
>
>
>
> # NAME <lbug> <dmname> <dedicated mon> <type>
>
>
>
> NAME WP0001 WP0001 .0 Engineer
>
> NAME WP0001 WP0002 .1 View_Only
>
> NAME WP0001 WP0003 REMPC1 View_Only
>
> NAME WP0001 WP0004 REMPC2 View_Only
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> GOPS
>
> Aramco Mobil Refinery
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: Brian Bates
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- » Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- Re: [foxboro] remote DM's on multi-headed machine
- From: Brian Bates