Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 22:57:44 -0500
Maybe you are right, but truthfully I haven't met too many
non-Don-Unixote-Luddites amongst Foxboro's customer base (zero, to be
precise). Where's the overwhelming tide of customers clamoring for
Windows that some folks in Foxboro told me existed?
Your plan's about the same as mine, though. Either stay with Solaris and
wait Foxboro out until their Windows story is more compelling, or switch
to a system on which Windows isn't such a handicap (I don't love Windows
in the general case, but these do exist).
As for Frits' original question, is the porting layer Foxboro used to be
able to say, "hey, we do Windows, too!" (MKS?) available to customer
programmers? I'm sure there are differences between it and Solaris (I've
already run across these with ksh scripts) but maybe it's close enough to
get you by. Stability and robustness, well, those are beyond the scope of
this book :)
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
"Duc M Do" <duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
05/29/2008 09:00 PM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
On Thu, May 29, 2008 9:34 pm, Schouten, Frits JF wrote:
> But getting back to my initial question, what is the future of
> all those (user) applications developed on the Unix platform?
...
> Anyone out there that have developed some sort of a plan that
> would get us out of a pickle?
We, the user community, have only ourselves to blame. When Foxboro started
to push Windows and promised the world, and I mean the world: full
compatibility, better functionalities, plug-and-play, cold fusion, etc.,
we all gullibly swallowed it all (except for a few
tilting-against-the-windmill sticks-in-the-mud old-timers Unix Luddites
who were just against changes -- whew, is that enough hyphens in one
phrase?). We all deluded ourselves with the marketing hooey and merrily
skipped down the primrose path into the MS-centric promised land. Well,
now the bed is made, it's time we all have to sleep in it.
I know this is the same old rant from same old me, but it bears repeating.
And no, I don't have a plan, other than feebly hanging on to the last few
Unix boxes and hope they see me through until my retirement (which is not
even a glimmer on the horizon). How's that for a plan?
Duc
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- From: Ted Jirik
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- From: Duc M Do
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- » Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- From: Ted Jirik
- Re: [foxboro] general modeling.
- From: Duc M Do