Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V8 #251
- From: Rguercio@xxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:10:13 EDT
In a message dated 7/26/2008 01:04:00 Central Daylight Time,
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
How about adding an Integral deadband to PIDA blocks, so that when the
process is within the deadband, the Integral action is turned off
I do this regularly with my advanced level control application (ALC). It is
pretty easy to use a calculator to flop your connected INT parameter between
9999 (inside deadband) to whatever you want when outside the deadband. The
nonlinear controller, by the way, works great (unlike the one Honeywell put
in and didn't support in Plantscape), but I usually only double the gain
outside the deadband, and have gone as high a tripling it for special
circumstances. Remember, you don't want the CV to come barreling in and out
the other
side of the deadband because of how severely you turned it around when
outside.
So the original tuning has to be able to take back over once the deadband
is entered, and you need to be somewhat judicious in choosing the width of the
deadband, which in the nonlin controller, does not have to be symmetric
about the setpoint.
RGC
12803 Josey Creek Ct.
Cypress, TX 77433
713-805-8742 cell
281-256-1111 home office/FAX
281-256-1333 home
**************Get fantasy football with free live scoring. Sign up for
FanHouse Fantasy Football today.
(http://www.fanhouse.com/fantasyaffair?ncid=aolspr00050000000020)
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V8 #251
- From: Nimmons, David
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V8 #251
- » Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V8 #251
- Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V8 #251
- From: Nimmons, David