Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V4 #108

Bob,
If you would like to discuss this off-list feel free to email me.

Sincerely, 

Diane Barkin Harris 
Harris Automation Services, Inc
P.O. Box 890472
Houston, Texas 77289
< http://www.HarrisAS.com> 
*  281-804-3675 (cell) 
*   hasinc@sbcglobalnet 



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brennen, Robert SCAN--
Sent: Sunday, March 28, 2004 6:44 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V4 #108


Greetings,

We are doing a project that involves both Fox I/A and Honeywell.  They =
both have ++ points and it is always difficult to choose based on PURE =
facts.  I maintain the difference at the end of the day (regardless of =
deficiencies) is based on the the ability of the host company to support =
their product.  It is painful to have to always explain why your problem =
is the most important one to work on.  I realize that companies have =
limited resources, but they should not advertise products that perform =
as advertised in "future" releases.

Rob Brennen
Shell Canada

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rguercio@xxxxxxx [mailto:Rguercio@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: March 26, 2004 3:46 PM
> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [foxboro] foxboro Digest V4 #108
>=20
>=20
> In a message dated 3/26/04 3:13:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,=20
> foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> Might this explain why people that have established Foxboro=20
> systems are
> somewhat reluctant to include a (cheap?) Microsoft based OS in their
> control
> While I have consulted on Foxboro systems for several years,=20
> I have only=20
> recently again had the "opportunity" to do some work on=20
> Honeywell TDC.  I have to=20
> say it is a painfully slow and awkward system both in=20
> configuring points/loops=20
> and in making even rudimentary graphics or mods.  And it=20
> doesn't look like=20
> Experion PKS (my next task) will be much better.  Heaven=20
> knows I've had my=20
> difficulties with Foxboro project engineering and attitude,=20
> but I still maintain=20
> the Fox I/A system is worlds above most others - case in=20
> point.  If Fox is now=20
> playing with this basic success (Unix/Solaris), will I be=20
> able to maintain this=20
> opinion?
>=20
> =20
> =20
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by=20
> Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you=20
> obtain here at
> your own risks. Read=20
> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> =20
> foxboro mailing list:            =20
> http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:        =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
> to unsubscribe:     =20
> mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
> =20
>=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: