Re: [foxboro] filter 4-20 signal

Back in the day, I suggested several changes to the SSEL block. Most of
which were implemented (operator bypass, bypass on bad value, cascaded
SSEL's for high and low, etc).

The one that wasn't implemented was average which really irritated me for
some reason. The capability is "right there" since there is an output that
tells you how many values were used "upstream" and of course the average.
This would have allowed a true average of unlimited values to be created.

What we need is a system architect! Where can we find one?

Regards,
 
Alex Johnson
Invensys Process Systems
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (voice)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Corey R Clingo
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 10:58 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] filter 4-20 signal

Interesting.  One advantage to the CALC approach is that I was able to do 
20 values at a time, where the SIGSEL limits you to 8.

Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.








"Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)" <ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
04/28/2005 08:53 AM
Please respond to foxboro

              To:  foxboro 
              cc: 
         Subject:       Re: [foxboro] filter 4-20 signal






Actually, you can feed the buckets into the SSEL block and tell it to
average the inputs.

This is simpler and easier to configure than the CALC block.



Regards,

Alex Johnson
Invensys Process Systems
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10707 Haddington
Houston, TX 77043
713.722.2859 (voice)
713.722.2700 (switchboard)
713.932.0222 (fax)
ajohnson@xxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On
Behalf Of Clement, Mark (KIDDMET)
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:37 AM
To: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: [foxboro] filter 4-20 signal

The DTIME's buckets are accessible (connectable) - so you could tie the
buckets to a calc block and do moving averages=20

my 2 cents
Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Corey R Clingo [mailto:clingoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 9:27 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] filter 4-20 signal


The DTIME block has some options that will do this.  I believe it can =
take=20
several samples of an analog value and then spit out an average.  =
However,=20
it is not "rolling"; in other words, it gathers, say, 10 samples, and =
on=20
the 10th it outputs an average.

To get a rolling average, we have used CALC/CALCA blocks here.  I've =
seen=20
at least two implementations.  I can post some CALC code if you like.


And of course the filtering option on the AIN is there...


Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.










 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: