Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 09:41:51 +0900
Tim,
d_edit is a front end script for d_edit50. It exists to provide
handling for legacy display manger graphics for the old Intel based
stations. On current workstations, d_edit passes your commands
directly to d_edit50.
dconn is/was an unsupported Foxboro tool from what I understand. I am
unfamiliar with it.
The main difference between the -r/R and the -l/L options are that the
-r/R report provides group names and hierarchy overview in addition to
the information provided by the -l/L reports.
Regards,
Kevin
On 4/30/08, Timothy Healey <HealeyT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> I went into Display builder and Display configurator and I think your right.
> The engineer at the time must have added a description line into his report
> to allow it to be more discernable in the future.
> Can you explain if there is any difference between d_edit, d_edit50 and
> dconn. I see d_edit and d_edit50 on my system. I don't know what dconn did
> but see it was some type of common tool used back when these displays were
> put in.
> I am also don't understand the difference between the -R (report) and -L
> (list) options on the D-edit command.
>
> Tim
> >>> "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx> 4/29/2008 8:48 PM >>>
> Timothy,
>
> I looked back through some of my old docs and can find no reference to
> a "Description" field in my d_edit -L display listings.
>
> In the display builder and display configurator I do not recall ever
> seeing anything that might be used as a Description field matching
> your documentation. In Display Builder or Display Configurator what
> field are you seeing the description you want to report on?
>
> I wonder if this description was perhaps added after the reports were
> generated specifically for your documentation rather than being part
> of the configured display?
>
> Regards,
>
> Kevin FitzGerrell
>
> On 4/30/08, Timothy Healey <HealeyT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Thankyou list for your time.
> >
> > I have a system that was installed around 1992 but I started using it
> > around 2002. Some things have changed and some things haven't. I found
> > something in our documentation for the system that provides information for
> > a display file.
> >
> > It Starts:
> >
> > DETAILED CONNECTION LIST
> > <filename and location>
> > REV: 4.1 03/09/92
> >
> > File Type = PDF
> > <a few more lines of text>
> > Record File size = 8096 bytes
> > DM load size = 5600 bytes
> >
> > INCOMING DATA CONNECTIONS
> > =====================
> > CON OBJ
> > NUM TYP row,Col Type delta path
> > Description
> > === === ===== ========== ====== ============== =================
> > 1 rect 60,51% Visibility
> > <compound:block.detail> Reactor 2 button
> >
> >
> > When I use "d_edit -L -o <filename>" I get something a little different.
> >
> > My main problem is not getting the description.
> >
> > DETAILED CONNECTION LIST
> > <filename and location>
> > REV: 5.1 (no date)
> >
> > File Type = 50 series
> > <a few more lines of text>
> > Record File size = 8096 bytes
> > (GONE)
> >
> > INCOMING DATA CONNECTIONS
> > =====================
> > CON OBJ
> > NUM TYP row,Col Type delta path
> > === === ===== ========== ====== ==============
> > 1 rect 60,51% Visibility
> > <compound:block.detail>
> >
> > So is DCONN something different that will add that description section?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Timothy Healey
> > Facilities Engineer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> >
> > foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> > to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> > to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Kevin Fitzgerrell
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Kevin Fitzgerrell
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey