Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: "Kevin Fitzgerrell" <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:48:29 +0900
Timothy,
I looked back through some of my old docs and can find no reference to
a "Description" field in my d_edit -L display listings.
In the display builder and display configurator I do not recall ever
seeing anything that might be used as a Description field matching
your documentation. In Display Builder or Display Configurator what
field are you seeing the description you want to report on?
I wonder if this description was perhaps added after the reports were
generated specifically for your documentation rather than being part
of the configured display?
Regards,
Kevin FitzGerrell
On 4/30/08, Timothy Healey <HealeyT@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thankyou list for your time.
>
> I have a system that was installed around 1992 but I started using it around
> 2002. Some things have changed and some things haven't. I found something
> in our documentation for the system that provides information for a display
> file.
>
> It Starts:
>
> DETAILED CONNECTION LIST
> <filename and location>
> REV: 4.1 03/09/92
>
> File Type = PDF
> <a few more lines of text>
> Record File size = 8096 bytes
> DM load size = 5600 bytes
>
> INCOMING DATA CONNECTIONS
> =====================
> CON OBJ
> NUM TYP row,Col Type delta path
> Description
> === === ===== ========== ====== ============== =================
> 1 rect 60,51% Visibility
> <compound:block.detail> Reactor 2 button
>
>
> When I use "d_edit -L -o <filename>" I get something a little different.
>
> My main problem is not getting the description.
>
> DETAILED CONNECTION LIST
> <filename and location>
> REV: 5.1 (no date)
>
> File Type = 50 series
> <a few more lines of text>
> Record File size = 8096 bytes
> (GONE)
>
> INCOMING DATA CONNECTIONS
> =====================
> CON OBJ
> NUM TYP row,Col Type delta path
> === === ===== ========== ====== ==============
> 1 rect 60,51% Visibility
> <compound:block.detail>
>
> So is DCONN something different that will add that description section?
>
>
>
>
>
> Timothy Healey
> Facilities Engineer
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- [foxboro] A4 Laser B&W printer for Foxboro
- From: Kashif Ijaz
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
- References:
- [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- » Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- [foxboro] A4 Laser B&W printer for Foxboro
- From: Kashif Ijaz
- Re: [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey
- [foxboro] d_edit vs d_edit50 vs dconn
- From: Timothy Healey