Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: "Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:42:39 -0400
Re: We are not discussing whether the IEE database should be written to
use
SQL or XML. We are voting to decide what our report format should be.
Voting may be a bit strong, but we are definitely considering data
reporting formats for the IEE and want informed opinions like those from
this group.
IPS reserve the right to do something arbitrary and unreasonable if we
so choose. :)
Re: That is a tougher question. Is SQL still the logical choice, if the
core data is in XML?
The core data is in a SQL Server database, but the entities of interest
are stored as a control scheme not as individual blocks. For that
reason, we need a reporting mechanism and a report format or formats.
Regards,
=
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
713.329.8472 (voice)
713.329.1700 (fax)
713.329.1600 (switchboard)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 12:41 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] client server
I vote for standardized, non-proprietary SQL tables.
I understand the motive for asking for Delimited ASCII. But, my
personal perspective is that I didn't write the tool that I use now for
harvesting ASCII data. It wouldn't bother me if someone else wrote the
SQL query interface tool. I would tell the interface what I was looking
for and it would spit out the data in a spreadsheet or ASCII, whichever
I wanted that day. If I wanted more than that, I could flex a few brain
cells, kill a couple pots of coffee, and come up with my own interface.
To paraphrase Jeremy and Tom, with SQL tables we could have everything
we have today and more.
I don't know enough about XML to say much about it. It is supposed to
be an open standard. Is it really? I mostly hear Microsoft beating the
XML drum. HTML is supposed to be an open standard too. But, MS
"embraced and extended" it so that web pages built with their tools
would break if opened by anyone else's browser. But, I digress... =3D20
We are not discussing whether the IEE database should be written to use
SQL or XML. We are voting to decide what our report format should be.
That is a tougher question. Is SQL still the logical choice, if the
core data is in XML?
Chuck Jones
Automation Technologist
Tate & Lyle -- Lafayette Plant
Office 765.477.5324 | Cell 765.586.5290
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Brazell, Troy L Jr
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 11:10 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] client server
I have to agree with Mr. Hurwitt. Even though SQL and XML files are fine
with me, I have a lot of folks that would find Delimited ASCII files
with headings easier to use.
**************************
Troy Brazell
DCP Midstream
ISA CCST
Sr. Process Control Analyst
Office 405-263-4130
Cell 405-301-2994
tlbrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gregory A Hurwitt
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:04 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] client server
Jeremy Milum wrote on 03/25/2007 09:15:24 PM:
> On 3/23/07, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> > Let's assume that we arrange to allow a command to publish the data
in
> > the configurators database. What format(s) should we consider?
> >
> > 1) SQL Tables
> > 2) XML files
> > 3) Excel workbook
> > 4) Delimited ASCII files with headings
>
> SQL Tables.
>
> If we have access to a truly relational database model of the
> configuration data, we can easily transform it into any of the others,
> but the opposite is not true.
> An Excel workbook would be the least favorable.
I disagree. I personally don't have access to or knowledge of SQL
tools.
Also, the database in this case is pretty much a flat file, isn't it?
I'll be working with the data in Excel. I'm happy to take the data in
delimited ASCII so others can also easily use their tool of choice. My
vote is for #4.
Greg Hurwitt
BASF Freeport
=3D3D20
=3D3D20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=3D3D20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: =3D3D
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Djoin
to unsubscribe: =3D3D
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Dleave
=3D3D20
=3D20
=3D20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=3D20
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Dleave
=3D20
************************************************************************
***=3D
**************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended =3D
solely for the=3D20
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are
not =3D
the intended=3D20
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the
intende=3D
d recipient, be=3D20
advised that you have received this email in error that any use,
disseminat=3D
ion,=3D20
forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
If =3D
you have received=3D20
this email in error please notify the sender immediately. Please note
that =3D
we reserve=3D20
the right to monitor and read any emails sent and received by the
Company i=3D
n=3D20
accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable legal rules.
************************************************************************
***=3D
**************************
=
=
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachment(s) =
to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) and =
may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you are=
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately, delete a=
ll copies of this message and any attachment(s). Any other use of the E-Mai=
l by you is prohibited.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Ted Jirik
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Brazell, Troy L Jr
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jones, Charles R. \(Chuck\)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- » Re: [foxboro] client server
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Ted Jirik
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Brazell, Troy L Jr
- Re: [foxboro] client server
- From: Jones, Charles R. \(Chuck\)