Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:16:31 -0600
A simple answer from a simple man: If INHOPT = 0 or 2, you wil see
"INHIBITED"; if INHOPT = 1 or 3, it wil say "DISABLED".
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
brad.s.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
12/18/2006 10:05 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary
reporter
OK, perhaps someone can answer this for me ... if I look at AIN blocks
with
Select, in the Alarms subscreen it wil show INHIBITED (in white text) next
to an alarm that I inhibit from that screen. However, sometimes I see an
alarm showing DISABLED (in black text), but I see no way to put an alarm
in
a disabled state from the Select screen ... only inhibited.
Can anyone shed some light ?
Brad Wilson
Process Control Engineer
ExxonMobil Chemical Co
Edison Synthetics Plant
732-321-6115
732-321-6177 fax
Brad.S.Wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- From: brad . s . wilson
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- » Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- From: brad . s . wilson