Re: [foxboro] ZCP-FBM connection options
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 10:03:03 -0500
You can connect the ZCPs to the FCMs using a dedicated, private network I
believe. Yes, you are still using switches if you want to go to more than
one set of FCMs, but they are not carrying mesh traffic and should not
have to have both fieldbus networks be cross-connected as with Mesh.
What you give up in doing that is the ability for System Management to
monitor those switches. But this may or may not be a problem; you can
use other network-management tools. In spite of that, this is how I would
hook these up as well, because like you I don't like the
all-eggs-in-one-basket concept of everything on the Mesh.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.
Fink Nottle <fnottle@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/22/2009 05:15 PM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[foxboro] ZCP-FBM connection options
All,
With the FCP270, the documented options to interface with FBM100s/200s
appear to be the following:
[AW]<-->[Mesh Control
Network]<-->[FCP270]<-->[FBI-100]<-->[FBM-100]<-->[Process]
&
[AW]<-->[Mesh Control Network ]<-->[FCP270]<-->[FBM-200]<-->[Process]
The primary benefit of the above approaches, in my mind, is that the
interface between the FCPs and the FBMs is closed, proprietary,
point-to-point & unmanaged.
With the ZCP, however, the documented interfaces between the CP and the
FBMs always
appear to be through some type of Mesh network (either a combined Mesh
Control+Fieldbus network, or standalone Mesh Fieldbus Network).
The drawback, in my mind, is that there are TCP/IP based managed "open"
network devices between the Controller and I/O. The impact of
planned/unplanned outages of this mesh-control/fieldbus-network when using
conventional 4-20A based field-devices (as opposed to FF) is essentially
loss of Level 1 control.
Is there a supported option to connect a ZCP to
FBM 200/100s without using the mesh-network (as possible with the FCPs)?
Thanks,
Daniel
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: