Re: [foxboro] Utility submissions re-visited.
- From: duc.do@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 14:33:42 -0400
At 11:03 AM 10/12/01 -0500, David Johnson wrote: > >This is in reference to Cassandra Submissions, etc. > >I think that I must take the blame for Cassandra submissions not being >handled well. Although they ultimately need to go to Duc for posting, >that's not really what I had in mind when I envisioned this project. <... description of much work involved snipped ...> In that case, do you think another list, something like foxboro-workers, is needed? I would think it's better to segregate the traffic so as not to overwhelm the casual list subscribers, and it will help to remain on-topic. I have no problem maintaining two lists, but if there is anyone who wants to share in the fun, talk to me, off-list. Duc _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp ___________________________________________________________________ This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company. Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer, see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist list info: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Utility submissions re-visited.