Re: [foxboro] Use of null device groups
- From: "William C Ricker" <wcricker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:30:07 -0400
>> Thanks, however I haven't seen a definitive responce on using group 0.
>>
>> Is Device Group 0 a valid null device for today and forward?
From a discussion a long time ago ...
> The "right" way to do this is to set (leave) the alarm group to (at) 0.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex Johnson
> Invensys Systems, Inc.
The full exchange can be seen here :
http://www.freelists.org/post/foxboro/foxboro-Hypothetical-alarming-question
You might also find other parts of that discussion relevant to what you are
doing.
Regards,
William C Ricker
FeedForward, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts: