Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: "Douglas G. Lloyd" <DGL@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:54:37 -0500
Johan,
You can leave the MCINs as is and just hang CIN blocks on those inputs which
you need to generate alarms for. Clear the IOMOPT parameter of the CIN
block and connect to the IN parameter ...
Regards,
Doug Lloyd
DGL Controls
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Johan.Van.Elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:18 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
Thanks Alex,
I'm aware of that problem now, but for me it's al lot of work because we
use a lot of MCIN block's comming from our Gateway
and like you said I have to split them to get an individual block (CIN or
STALM) for each alarm
So my question is now:
Are there some other possibilities ? What is the best option for alarms
comming from a gateway ?
Kind Regards,
Johan Van Elsen
INDAVER
Systeembeheerder
E-mail: Johan.van.elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
Tel : + 32 (0)3 / 568-48-65
Fax: + 32 (0)3 / 568-49-99
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Johan . Van . Elsen
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Johan . Van . Elsen