Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Johan.Van.Elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:17:42 +0100
Thanks Alex,
I'm aware of that problem now, but for me it's al lot of work because we
use a lot of MCIN block's comming from our Gateway
and like you said I have to split them to get an individual block (CIN or
STALM) for each alarm
So my question is now:
Are there some other possibilities ? What is the best option for alarms
comming from a gateway ?
Kind Regards,
Johan Van Elsen
INDAVER
Systeembeheerder
E-mail: Johan.van.elsen@xxxxxxxxxx
Tel : + 32 (0)3 / 568-48-65
Fax: + 32 (0)3 / 568-49-99
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Douglas G. Lloyd
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- » Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- Re: [foxboro] UNACK bit of a BLNALM block
- From: Douglas G. Lloyd