Re: [foxboro] SysDef

Softpak had it's own special version of SysDef 1.03 and then 1.04 when
micropak was added ..it could only be used for  Softpak only !!

All other versions of SysDef DO NOT SUPPORT SOFTPAK...
All other versions support mixed nodes of 51's and 70's  .....but not
softpak !!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@CORP  On Behalf Of Ron Deen
> <r.deen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:24 PM
> To:   foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject:      Re: [foxboro] SysDef
> 
> 
> Where's the "Yes" or the "No"?
> 
> "Yes", System Definition can be used to maintain System Configurations for
> both NT and UNIX. (All versions are able to do that btw.) With I/A 6.1 and
> higher you can have NT and UNIX mixed in one and the same config.
> 
> And "Maybe" this includes SoftPack. I'm not sure if Softpack configs can
> be
> maintained with standard SysDef.
> 
> So it is a simple "Yes" and "Maybe" question.....
> 
> Regards
> 
> Ron Deen
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 23 April 2002 20:03, you wrote:
> > System Definition has to run on an NT box, but the same software can be
> > used to create a system configuration file that be used for either NT or
> > Unix.  Softpack is an NT version of I/A software and therefore I would
> > expect the regular System Definition to work on it, but maybe Foxboro
> did
> > something different.
> >
> > Neil Martin
> > Huntsman Corporation
> > 7114 North Lamar Blvd
> > Austin, TX.  78752
> > ph) 512-483-0119
> >
> >
> >
> >                     "Burnham, Rob C."
> >                     <rburnham@Glatfelt        To:     'Foxboro List'
> > <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> er.com>                   cc:
> >                     Sent by:                  Subject:     [foxboro]
> SysDef
> >                     foxboro-bounce@fre
> >                     elists.org
> >
> >
> >                     04/23/02 11:42 AM
> >                     Please respond to
> >                     foxboro
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Here's something you don't see much of
> > on this list, a Yes or No question.
> >
> > In the past, I used Softpack SysDef for NT
> > and SysDef 2.0 for Unix.
> > Does SysDef 2.1 support both platforms?
> >
> > Rob Burnham
> > Systems Engineer - Process
> > GLATFELTER
> >
> > > http://www.glatfelter.com
> >
> > Ph: 920-727-2426
> >
> > Beyond Paper.....
> >
> >   is everything we do above and beyond making great paper - that makes
> us
> > unique.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> > Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> > your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> >
> > foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> > to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> > to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> 
> foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>  


-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: