Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- From: "Neil Martin" <neil_martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:03:34 -0500
System Definition has to run on an NT box, but the same software can be
used to create a system configuration file that be used for either NT or
Unix. Softpack is an NT version of I/A software and therefore I would
expect the regular System Definition to work on it, but maybe Foxboro did
something different.
Neil Martin
Huntsman Corporation
7114 North Lamar Blvd
Austin, TX. 78752
ph) 512-483-0119
"Burnham, Rob C."
<rburnham@Glatfelt To: 'Foxboro List'
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
er.com> cc:
Sent by: Subject: [foxboro] SysDef
foxboro-bounce@fre
elists.org
04/23/02 11:42 AM
Please respond to
foxboro
Here's something you don't see much of
on this list, a Yes or No question.
In the past, I used Softpack SysDef for NT
and SysDef 2.0 for Unix.
Does SysDef 2.1 support both platforms?
Rob Burnham
Systems Engineer - Process
GLATFELTER
> http://www.glatfelter.com
Ph: 920-727-2426
Beyond Paper.....
is everything we do above and beyond making great paper - that makes us
unique.
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- From: Ron Deen
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- » Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- » Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- Re: [foxboro] SysDef
- From: Ron Deen