Re: [foxboro] Sys Def questions

  • From: "Boulay, Russ" <Russ.Boulay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:22:44 -0400

Also..to be in the state your system is in.....after users update the SysDef
with the online built ECB's...they usually marked the FBM's DONE in SysDef
since the system already knows about them. This can lead to the next
commital pass thru..resulting in IIF.cur saying DONE for all FBM's and still
not have ciofiles...because the ECB's have never been commital installed in
the NOTYET state.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@CORP  On Behalf Of "Lowell, Tim:"
> <tlowell@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:02 PM
> To:   'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject:      [foxboro] Sys Def questions
> 
> 
> I have some questions about SysDef and the commit install process I was
> hoping someone knew the answer to.   We have 2 nodes, and on the AW of one
> node, in the directory /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles, there is a list of files with
> names corresponding the letterbugs of the CP's and Intelligent FBM's.  In
> each file is a list of the FBM's or Intelligent Transmitter child ECB's
> attached to that CP or Intelligent FBM that were included in the SysDef.
> 
> However, on the other node's AW, /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles has all the same
> type
> of files, but the files representing the CP's do not have any FBM listings
> in them.  They only have one entry, corresponding the CP itself.  The
> Intelligent FBM files look the same as the first node, though.  It's only
> the CP files that have missing information.
> 
> What process populates the files in /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles with the FBM
> letterbugs?  Did we somehow manage to skip a step during our last upgrade?
> What happens if the FBM letterbug listings aren't there?  The most current
> SysDef and the IIF.cur file on the second node lists all the FBM's on the
> second node, and the FBM's are obviously running OK.
> 
> As far as I can figure out, this appears to have happened during our last
> upgrade in August 2001.  The files in /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles used to contain
> similar amounts of data on both nodes prior to that.  Does anybody have
> any
> knowledge of these files they can share?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> 
> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>  


-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef


 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: