Re: [foxboro] Sys Def questions
- From: "Boulay, Russ" <Russ.Boulay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:17:47 -0400
The node that you have the ciofiles on ....the FBM's were built in SysDef.
The node where the files are missing ....the ECB's were built online in the
ICC configurator.....the ECB's on this type of system are carried from
upgrade to upgrade thru the SAVALL diskettes. Some users will then update
their SysDef by going back later and adding them to SysDef....however
..until a commital is past thru the system that containds the FBM ECB's
...there will be no ciofiles.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx@CORP On Behalf Of "Lowell, Tim:"
> <tlowell@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:02 PM
> To: 'foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [foxboro] Sys Def questions
>
>
> I have some questions about SysDef and the commit install process I was
> hoping someone knew the answer to. We have 2 nodes, and on the AW of one
> node, in the directory /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles, there is a list of files with
> names corresponding the letterbugs of the CP's and Intelligent FBM's. In
> each file is a list of the FBM's or Intelligent Transmitter child ECB's
> attached to that CP or Intelligent FBM that were included in the SysDef.
>
> However, on the other node's AW, /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles has all the same
> type
> of files, but the files representing the CP's do not have any FBM listings
> in them. They only have one entry, corresponding the CP itself. The
> Intelligent FBM files look the same as the first node, though. It's only
> the CP files that have missing information.
>
> What process populates the files in /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles with the FBM
> letterbugs? Did we somehow manage to skip a step during our last upgrade?
> What happens if the FBM letterbug listings aren't there? The most current
> SysDef and the IIF.cur file on the second node lists all the FBM's on the
> second node, and the FBM's are obviously running OK.
>
> As far as I can figure out, this appears to have happened during our last
> upgrade in August 2001. The files in /usr/fox/sp/ciofiles used to contain
> similar amounts of data on both nodes prior to that. Does anybody have
> any
> knowledge of these files they can share?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tim
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
> foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
> to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
> to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
-- No attachments (even text) are allowed --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
