Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about

Like Greg, I use the CALC I/O clamping on occasion.

I rarely use LOGIC unless I know that it is and always will be used for a 
simple function (e.g., delaying alarms on one or two other blocks). 
Invariably when I think I'm going to get away with a LOGIC the code or 
application requirements outgrow it.  I've been fortunate enough that the 
CP space/utilization has not been an issue for me, even on my CP30As.


Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation






Gregory A Hurwitt <gregory.hurwitt@xxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/24/2008 08:57 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about






David Johnson wrote on 07/23/2008 03:18:21 PM:

> Should the CALC, LOGIC and MATH block be killed off in favor of the
> CALCA?

CALC offers output clamping, the others don't.  Comes in handy
occasionally.

LOGIC uses about 50% less memory than CALCA, and yes, I actually have some
CP's where this matters.

Greg Hurwitt
BASF Corp.
Freeport, TX

 



 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: