Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- From: "BrianLong" <blong@xxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 11:58:50 -0500
Not sure I understand why is there discussion about getting rid of blocks?
How about adding a few new blocks like a motor block that has a few more
options or a block that can do rolling averages with, etc...
Just Curious,
Brian Long
Arkansas Kraft
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 11:16 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
Like Corey, I (often) use LOGIC blocks for their inexpensive alarm delay
capability (to filter out spikes). I sometimes use them for creating
interlocks where I need to OR or AND some inputs. If LOGIC blocks go away,
I can use a MON block for the same function. For alarm delays, I could
still use the larger CALC or CALCA. =20
I think we should keep LOGIC blocks. Or, better yet, build a Delay ON
function into our existing alarms.
Chuck Jones
Automation Technologist
Tate & Lyle South Plant
***************************************************************************=
*****************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended =
solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are not = the intended=20 recipient or the person
responsible for delivering the email to the intende= d recipient, be=20
advised that you have received this email in error that any use, disseminat=
ion,=20 forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly
prohibited. If = you have received=20 this email in error please notify the
sender immediately. Please note that = we reserve=20 the right to monitor
and read any emails sent and received by the Company i= n=20 accordance with
and to the extent permitted by applicable legal rules.
Tate & Lyle PLC, registered in England: number 76535. Registered office: Ta=
te & Lyle PLC, Sugar Quay, Lower Thames Street, London EC3R 6DQ.=20
Tate & Lyle Industries Limited registered in England:number 699090.
Registered office: Tate & Lyle Industries Limited, Sugar Quay, Lower Thames=
Street, London EC3R 6DQ
***************************************************************************=
******************************
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your
own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- From: Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- » Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- From: Corey R Clingo
- Re: [foxboro] Some things to talk about
- From: Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)