Re: [foxboro] Server 70 client as Configuration Station
- From: Ron Deen <r.deen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 20:21:56 +0100
Remote DM's or Foxviews are not an option with 70Series. You could
upgrade to a 70 style C and get more "room". Adding a WP70 may be more
efficient?
Using an AW for operations is not a problem. From the Operator's point
of view it's the same as a WP70. It may be a bit slower due to
additional functions it performs but that is usually compensated by
adding more memory and a SCSI subsystem so it normally is a non-issue.
I will continue having weekend now ;-))
Regards,
Ron Deen (Foxboro)
Loupe, Rory (RJ) wrote:
>Purchase an additional display manager and install it on the AW. Purchase
>Exceed or GoGlobal and install it on a PC. Make sure the AW's 2nd Ethernet
>port is configured and connected to the same LAN as the PC with Exceed. Do
>your configuration from the PC.
>
>Does anyone else allow their AW to be used as an operator workstation? We
>are considering doing so. Are there some very good reasons why we should
>not allow an operator to use the AW as a workstation?
>
> Rory Loupe
> The Dow Chemical Company
> LHC-3
> P.O. Box 150, Building 6801
> Plaquemine, LA 70765-0150 USA
> Phone: 225.353-6409 Fax: 225.353.6968
> E-mail: RJLoupe@xxxxxxx
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: eric.konings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:eric.konings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 4:05 AM
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [foxboro] Server 70 client as Configuration Station
>
>
>
>Hello all,
>
>Up to now all the configuration work on our I/A NT-system is done on a
>AW70.
>For Operator Control, there is one WP70 (with dual screen) available.
>When no configuration is in progress (at this moment this is a lot off the
>time), the AW70 is also available for the operators.
>Due to adding more and more process part to this I/A system, the AW70
>becomes less time available for the operators, which is becoming a problem.
>We could add a second WP70 to our nodebus, for operator use and claim the
>AW70 as a almost full-time Configuration Station.
>To save some money, the alternative idea is upgrading the AW70 towards AW70
>C, and use a client as Configuration Station. In this proposition, the
>AW70C server remains aivailable for the operators.
>
>Are there any experiences with this kind of solution ?
>
>Regards,
>Eric Konings
>Degussa Antwerp
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company.
>Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer,
>see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist
>
>list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company.
>Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer,
>see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist
>
>list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
>
___________________________________________________________________
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by The Foxboro Company.
Use the information obtained here at your own risk. For disclaimer,
see http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html#maillist
list info: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
