Re: [foxboro] Sanity check on Go Global

On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0500, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) wrote:
> 
> GoGlobal is much faster. We sell it as part of our dialup solution -
> FoxRemote Configurations 1, 2, and 3.
> 
> Hummingbird's eXceed works over dialup, but with FV you see significant
> performance hit relative to GoGlobal on a phone line.
> 

Thanks for the fast reply.

Yes, if my assumptions are correct, I can easily see that would be the case
the X protocol is well known to not work on low bandwidth connections. As a
matter of fact I deployed many many years ago, a solution to provide
dialup access to a X based control system using some software (from the
makers of PC/FTP if memory serves).

Given a fast network, is there any advantage of using Go Global?

Also, could you comment on my assumptions?

-- 
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
                                                -- Benjamin Franklin
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: