Re: [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
- From: "Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:14:47 -0400
The model that I described is in use on a large project in India with
30+ process units.
If you are in class, try it.
Regards,
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
713.329.8472 (voice)
713.329.1700 (fax)
713.329.1600 (switchboard)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Adam.Pemberton@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 10:29 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email
found in subject
Thanks Alex. Your response enlightens me greatly, including to another
possible piece of confusion I've got from this course.
=
We have been told that you cannot import a SysDef committal into an
existing IACC database. It can only be imported into a new database. If
this was the case, then using SysDef would not be practical since one
would have to edit SysDef and all IACC databases by hand whenever the
System Definition changes (which seems to be every month here at LGL at
the moment).
=
Can you please clarify?
=
Regards
Adam
=
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Sent: Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:36 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [foxboro] Question on IACC database limit - Email
found in subject
=
Here's my advice:
=
1) Use SysDef not IACC for system definitions
2) Use an IACC server per plant area
=
=
-------------------
<Rest of the thread removed>
=
=
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=
Confidentiality Notice:
This e-mail and any associated files are intended solely for the individual=
or entity to whom they are addressed. Please do not copy it or use it for =
any purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Further, this e=
-mail and any associated files may be confidential and further may be legal=
ly privileged. This email is from the Invensys Process Systems business uni=
t of Invensys plc which is a company registered in England and Wales with i=
ts registered office at Portland House, Bressenden Place, London, SW1E 5BF =
(Registered number 166023). For a list of European legal entities within t=
he Invensys Process Systems business group, please click here http://www.in=
vensys.com/legal/default.asp?top_nav_id=3D77&nav_id=3D80&prev_id=3D77.
If you have received this e-mail in error, you are on notice of its status.=
Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message =
from your system. Thank you for your co-operation. You may contact our Help=
desk on +44 (0)20 7821 3859 / 2105 or email inet.hqhelpdesk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx T=
his e-mail and any attachments thereto may be subject to the terms of any a=
greements between Invensys (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates) and the=
recipient (and/or its subsidiaries and affiliates).
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
- From: Adam.Pemberton
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
- [foxboro] [SPAM] - Re: Question on IACC database limit - Email found in subject
- From: Adam.Pemberton