Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- From: Miguel Mansilla <mansilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:40:50 -0300
Alex,
thanks for your answer, but i was reading in B0193AX and there are two
parameters: FPE06 and FPM06 for filter functions and the minimum value
specified is 4 msecs, then i think the resolution should be greater than 4
msecs ... am i wrong ?
Regards,
Miguel
At 12:19 p.m. 29/11/2006, you wrote:
>Using the EVENT block in the CP, the answer is 1ms, but...
>
>The 1ms applies only to the FBMs under the same CP are coordinated to
>1ms. There may be considerable drift between FBMs under different CPs so
>a system-wide SOE is not possible at this time.
>
>
>Under V8 with a GPS and associated time-synchronization network, a
>system-wide SOE is possible with a different mechanism. This approach
>has limitations of its own (of course), but it does allow system-wide
>SOE at 1ms.
>
>
>Does this help?
>
>
>Regards,
>=20
>Alex Johnson
>Invensys Systems, Inc.
>10900 Equity Drive
>Houston, TX 77041
>713.329.8472 (voice)
>713.329.1700 (fax)
>713.329.1600 (switchboard)
>alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Miguel Mansilla
>Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 3:16 PM
>To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [foxboro] SOE resolution
>
>Hello,
>for an application i need to know what is the minimum resolution in
>msecs=20
>that i can get using SOE for events detection. I was checking in the IA=20
>documentation the B0193AX, Rev L related with ECB6, but i would like to=20
>know about your experience.
>Thanks in advance,
>Miguel=20
>
>=20
>=20
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>=20
>foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
>to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
>=20
>
>
>
>Confidentiality Notice: =0AThe information contained in this electronic m=
>essage and any attachment(s) to this message are intended for the exclusi=
>ve use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged or pr=
>oprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please noti=
>fy the sender immediately, delete all copies of this message and any atta=
>chment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is prohibited.=0A
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>
>foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- » Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- Re: [foxboro] SOE resolution
- From: Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)