Re: [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:33:24 -0500
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:48:23PM -0500, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) wrote:
>
> When the I/A Series was developed, there were a number of constraints on the
> developers. One of them was the lack of technology for drawing on a WP from
> an AP. Remember that WP's were diskless then - basically thin clients.
>
Just when I think I've uncovered all the dusty little bits :-)
I remeber RFS, it was a better idea, that was unable to displace the
de-facto standard.
Thansk for educating me on this. I feel much more confortable now.
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- References:
- [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- » Re: [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- » Re: [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- » Re: [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- [foxboro] Remote Draw Applications
- From: Johnson, Alex (Foxboro)