Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- From: steve.shimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:53:19 -0500
We have drug RBatch through various hardware and software upgrades over the
years, even though we abandoned using RBatch for its primary purposes over
a decade ago. Why? Because of RBatch's ability to redirect OMI messages
from sequence code.
Steve Shimp
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi
Other related posts:
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- » Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- Re: [foxboro] RBatch or RBatch II Users?
- From: Joseph M. Riccardi