Re: [foxboro] Question about parameters updating?

What does the station block say?

I've never experienced this, but I have noticed that the idle time in the
virtual CP is highly dependent on the idle time in Windows, which makes
sense since it's the same CPU they're running on.  I don't know what
happens to the virtual CP when Windows runs out of free time (100% CPU
usage in Task Manager), but it can't be good.

I also had problems with deadbands in some of the Foxview displays, but
only on FRIN blocks.  These have no range parameter (e.g., RO1) so the
detail displays default to 0.1 engineering unit deadbands.  This was not
low enough for some of our points, so I had to modify them.

Corey Clingo
BASF Corp.



|---------+---------------------------->
|         |           Pirata Enrique   |
|         |           <pirataenrique@ya|
|         |           hoo.com.ar>      |
|         |           Sent by:         |
|         |           foxboro-bounce@fr|
|         |           eelists.org      |
|         |                            |
|         |                            |
|         |           10/07/2003 10:44 |
|         |           AM               |
|         |           Please respond to|
|         |           foxboro          |
|         |                            |
|---------+---------------------------->
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                             
                                                 |
  |              To:  foxboro                                                   
                                                 |
  |              cc:                                                            
                                                 |
  |       Subject:  [foxboro] Question about parameters updating?               
                                                 |
  
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




Hi. I'v a Fox I/A AW70x running under Windows NT4.0
and I don't know why i have a very low cycle speed.
In other words when i move the MEAS parameter its take
about 63 seconds to update PNT parameter, ussing any
I/O block

If somebody knows why this is happening, please replay
to me as soon as possible. Thanks!!!!


------------
Internet GRATIS es Yahoo! Conexión
4004-1010 desde Buenos Aires. Usuario: yahoo; contraseña: yahoo
Más ciudades: http://conexion.yahoo.com.ar


_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html

foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave






 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             http://www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: